gchopes
04-19 12:28 PM
My lawyer said it was ok and we have applied for h4 extension for spouse. Its under regular processing at VSC so I won't know the outcome for a few months.
wallpaper Keira Knightley Photos
dahai
03-10 05:14 PM
Hi,
My wife has received the ASC notice of biometric appointment. But I did not. She filed as dependent of my concurrent I-140 + I-485 case. I am wondering if there is anything wrong. Should we receive the notice together? Or it is normal to have seperate appointments? Then how long could be the interval between the notices? Anyone in the same situation before? Could I find it out by Infopass appointment?
Thanks!
My wife has received the ASC notice of biometric appointment. But I did not. She filed as dependent of my concurrent I-140 + I-485 case. I am wondering if there is anything wrong. Should we receive the notice together? Or it is normal to have seperate appointments? Then how long could be the interval between the notices? Anyone in the same situation before? Could I find it out by Infopass appointment?
Thanks!
kghoshal
08-17 01:02 AM
I am on H1B 8th year extension, my priority date is September,2004. When I join new employer, Will I lose my current priority date as well as LC?
2011 August 2008, 16:25
kamboj
05-08 12:51 AM
Need urgent help.
I have files my visa (H1B), where I have diffence in my first name printed in my passport than on all my degree certificates.
In my 10th standard certifciate it was printed as "Gorav" should have been "Gaurav". But in all my degree certificates it's "Gaurav".
My last name is same in all certificates, passport etc.
My parents name and Date of birth and home address is also same in all certificates and passport.
When I filed my H1B I filled up my first name as "Gorav" (as it is in passport).
What shall I do know? Will it have any impact on my visa approval?
What shall I do before they ask me for any question?
Please help as it's time sensitive issue
Thanks in advance
I have files my visa (H1B), where I have diffence in my first name printed in my passport than on all my degree certificates.
In my 10th standard certifciate it was printed as "Gorav" should have been "Gaurav". But in all my degree certificates it's "Gaurav".
My last name is same in all certificates, passport etc.
My parents name and Date of birth and home address is also same in all certificates and passport.
When I filed my H1B I filled up my first name as "Gorav" (as it is in passport).
What shall I do know? Will it have any impact on my visa approval?
What shall I do before they ask me for any question?
Please help as it's time sensitive issue
Thanks in advance
more...
srinivasj
07-07 01:38 PM
Yes, you need to get the difference in fees. HDFC knows about this and will issue a new colored fee slip.
Thanks Oscarzumaran....do they issue a new receipt number too..? or can I still use my old one just in case if dates open up...?
Thanks Oscarzumaran....do they issue a new receipt number too..? or can I still use my old one just in case if dates open up...?
sw33t
08-30 02:54 PM
http://www.eetimes.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201802703&cid=RSSfeed_eetimes_newsRSS
Digg It at:
-----------
http://digg.com/politics/Why_we_need_legal_immigrants/share
Digg It at:
-----------
http://digg.com/politics/Why_we_need_legal_immigrants/share
more...
thomachan72
06-22 07:09 AM
Hi I heard there are 2 catagories in L1. Managerial /executive and the other one is highly skilled. Where you in the first catagory which does not require the labor certification? or did you have to get the LC?
2010 Keira Knightley
mmk123
08-04 12:46 PM
sorry, posted on wrong forum initially.
Reposting with new thread.
****
Applied: April first week - it went in 2010 rush
Received: April last week
RFE: June first week
July first week: RFE response sent
July last week: Approval notice sent
August first week: approval notice received
Documents requested for RFE (also suggested by lawyer):
- Client Letter, role/responsibilities, duties, technologies used, company profile etc.
This letter also clearly stated all entities involved and their relationships with each other.
- Purchase Order and Other contract related stuff (all possible). Everyone co-operated.
- Badge (main bulding, her office), timesheets
- photos (cubicle/office building,company logo etc), login screen, machine etc, client phone directory
- copies of recent pay stub and offer letter, job duties
Thanks to everyone who contribute on this forum. It helped us a lot. This is for my wife.
Reposting with new thread.
****
Applied: April first week - it went in 2010 rush
Received: April last week
RFE: June first week
July first week: RFE response sent
July last week: Approval notice sent
August first week: approval notice received
Documents requested for RFE (also suggested by lawyer):
- Client Letter, role/responsibilities, duties, technologies used, company profile etc.
This letter also clearly stated all entities involved and their relationships with each other.
- Purchase Order and Other contract related stuff (all possible). Everyone co-operated.
- Badge (main bulding, her office), timesheets
- photos (cubicle/office building,company logo etc), login screen, machine etc, client phone directory
- copies of recent pay stub and offer letter, job duties
Thanks to everyone who contribute on this forum. It helped us a lot. This is for my wife.
more...
chanduv23
11-17 10:12 PM
If you live in Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, and anywhere else in the Upstate NY region, please post here.
hair Keira Knightley 16
houston2005
07-15 07:40 PM
1. take info pass appt and request them to issue a interim EAD.
2.Meanwhile also contact your local congressman/woman and take thier help.
I used both the routes
2.Meanwhile also contact your local congressman/woman and take thier help.
I used both the routes
more...
Macaca
03-11 06:42 PM
Some paras from Securing Iraq Votes, One at a Time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/10/AR2007031001300.html) -- House Democratic Leaders Methodically Build Support for War Plan
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
hot 899040keiraknightley16 Keira
AlxGofOC
12-19 06:04 PM
Hello all
Does any trail blazer of data patterns care to hint at the next generation pattern? or is MVVM going to be the popular one for a while. Thanks =D
~Alex
Does any trail blazer of data patterns care to hint at the next generation pattern? or is MVVM going to be the popular one for a while. Thanks =D
~Alex
more...
house Knightley too #39;shy#39; for fame
Blog Feeds
03-31 12:40 PM
USCIS has not extended its temporary accommodation for delays in the labor condition application (LCA) process. Earlier, USCIS agreed to accept H-1B petitions without a certified LCA, in certain situations, for a limited time. This exception was available from November 5, 2009 to March 9, 2010. The USCIS has declined to extend this exception. Accordingly, all H-1B petitions must be filed with the certified LCA otherwise USCIS will deny the H-1B petition or extension.
Hence, it again is necessary to have an Approved LCA in place for the proper location at the time of the H-1B filing. The reason the exception was not extended is that the DOL assured USCIS that LCAs are being processed within the required seven-day processing time. The DOL, in fact, stated that LCAs are being processed within four to five days which is in fact true as well. It is our suggestion to plan accordingly.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/03/lca_needs_to_be_certified_agai.html)
Hence, it again is necessary to have an Approved LCA in place for the proper location at the time of the H-1B filing. The reason the exception was not extended is that the DOL assured USCIS that LCAs are being processed within the required seven-day processing time. The DOL, in fact, stated that LCAs are being processed within four to five days which is in fact true as well. It is our suggestion to plan accordingly.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/03/lca_needs_to_be_certified_agai.html)
tattoo Keira Knightley and boyfriend
Blog Feeds
08-28 07:50 AM
This is a detail from the June USCIS Ombudsman report I hadn't noticed before, but a BusinessWeek report this week highlights that fact. We immigration lawyers have sensed that this was the case, of course. We regularly warn clients now to simply expect them even if the case is air tight. Businessweek reports The U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service says no crackdown is afoot. 'We haven't changed the way that we do our business over the course of the past few years,' says agency spokesman Christopher Bentley. Of course, the statistics show otherwise. One very senior former USCIS confided in...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/h-1b-requests-for-evidence-have-doubled-in-the-last-year.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/h-1b-requests-for-evidence-have-doubled-in-the-last-year.html)
more...
pictures Mar 16, 10:14 AM
berryberry6
12-15 07:58 AM
American Family Visas are permanent Immigrant Visas, meaning genuine applicants under this category may obtain permanent residency in America if they meet qualifying requirements.
Family migration is based around 2 general categories; one is based on a preference system and the other offers permanent residency regardless of the demand for Immigrant Visas. The latter, the Non-preference Category, is for immediate relatives of American citizens.
Fiancee's of American citizens will need to apply for a temporary non-immigrant K1 Visa if they wish to join their partner in America.
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
Family migration is based around 2 general categories; one is based on a preference system and the other offers permanent residency regardless of the demand for Immigrant Visas. The latter, the Non-preference Category, is for immediate relatives of American citizens.
Fiancee's of American citizens will need to apply for a temporary non-immigrant K1 Visa if they wish to join their partner in America.
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
dresses Keira Knightley
solaris27
08-07 09:13 AM
no
more...
makeup Keira Knightley, Eva Mendes
fatboysam
08-22 08:06 PM
I was on l1b visa from Jun 2008 to Jun 2010, then my company filed my h1b change of status, so now technically i am on h1b status , but i sill have l1b stamped on my passport, i am going to India for vacactions, so i will have stamp my h1b visa, now my question is :
1. Can the Visa officer ask why your company moved you from L1b to H1b with COS ?
2. If the officer asks me, do you plan stay in US permanently ?
What should be the correct answers to these questions ?
Thanks
1. Can the Visa officer ask why your company moved you from L1b to H1b with COS ?
2. If the officer asks me, do you plan stay in US permanently ?
What should be the correct answers to these questions ?
Thanks
girlfriend Star Wars: Keira Knightley
a_yaja
06-14 03:40 PM
Now that the I-485 gates have been opened, I would like to know what will happen to my spouse's H1B application pending before USCIS? Since I am planning on filing for I-485 for my spouse as well, will the H1B process make a difference? Or will the H1B approval cause any issues to the I-485 application?
Please help!
Please help!
hairstyles Keira Knightley (16) by
lvinaykumar
03-01 06:34 PM
Dont see much activity?
gc28262
03-25 11:41 PM
LCA:
LCA has to be for the location where you work -- Los-Angeles CA
Taxes:
You have to pay taxes where you live -- Los-Angeles CA
If your employer deducts taxes for NJ, there is nothing illegal about it.
You have to correct that from your side.
1. File a tax return for NJ and claim back all the taxes your employer deducted for NJ.
2. File a tax return for Los-Angeles, CA and pay all the taxes due for CA state.
LCA has to be for the location where you work -- Los-Angeles CA
Taxes:
You have to pay taxes where you live -- Los-Angeles CA
If your employer deducts taxes for NJ, there is nothing illegal about it.
You have to correct that from your side.
1. File a tax return for NJ and claim back all the taxes your employer deducted for NJ.
2. File a tax return for Los-Angeles, CA and pay all the taxes due for CA state.
Sumedha_inCal
03-10 02:40 PM
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment